Re: Document request from our COGA Task Force:

Hi Janina The correct link is https://w3c.github.io/coga/content-usable/ Please be aware that this is an early working draft! We will want to publish often to make sure we are on the right track  and know we have a lot to do to be a final draft.  All the best Lisa Seeman LinkedIn, Twitter ---- On Thu, 01 Nov 2018 15:56:37 +0200 Janina Sajka <janina@rednote.net> wrote ---- Colleagues: Before we move to a formal Call for Consensus (CfC) on this question, we would like to test the general level of consensus in APA--and to expose any concerns or problems with the following. The COGA Gap Analysis document has included an Appendix which has been growing greatly. It is now the consensus view in COGA that this Appendix would better stand alone as a separate, note-track document. So, before we ask APA and AG for authorization to publish the following as a First Public Working Draft (FPWD): https://w3c.github.io/coga/gap-analysis/usable.html We would request your review for any concerns or observations on this contemplated split-off. If you have any questions or concerns about this prospective request, please respond on list. Janina -- Janina Sajka Linux Foundation Fellow Executive Chair, Accessibility Workgroup:    http://a11y.org The World Wide Web Consortium (W3C), Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI) Chair, Accessible Platform Architectures    http://www.w3.org/wai/apa

Received on Thursday, 1 November 2018 14:46:46 UTC