- From: Shane McCarron <shane@spec-ops.io>
- Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2016 17:23:36 -0500
- To: Léonie Watson <tink@tink.uk>
- Cc: Katie Haritos-Shea GMAIL <ryladog@gmail.com>, Accessible Platform Architectures Working Group <public-apa@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAJdbnODy7rwarSQJynUkSe9cfAT55LGKW9sKJxC47FRYx3B+Fg@mail.gmail.com>
The APA working group has requested that I add something in there about how may requirements on user interface experiences are defined via WCAG. I will incorporate some language about that tomorrow. On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 1:09 PM, Léonie Watson <tink@tink.uk> wrote: > LGTM. > > > -- > @LeonieWatson tink.uk Carpe diem > > On 10/08/2016 17:41, Shane McCarron wrote: > >> So, to be clear, the final version of the proposed wording is: >> >> This specification has no defined user interface. Consequently, >> there are no specific accessibility requirements on implementations. >> However, to the extent that an implementation provides user >> interactions to support this specification, the implementation must >> ensure that the interface is exposed to the platform accessibility >> API. Moreover, implementors should take into consideration the needs >> of their users with varying abilities when designing solutions that >> implement this specification. For example, the use of biometric >> authentication techniques should be varied enough to allow for >> people with widely differing physical abilities. >> >> >> >> On Tue, Aug 9, 2016 at 8:21 AM, Léonie Watson <tink@tink.uk >> <mailto:tink@tink.uk>> wrote: >> >> On 09/08/2016 14:12, Shane McCarron wrote: >> >> Nice! Friendly amendment? I think that "widely differing >> physical >> abilities" is more poetic than "widely different physical >> abilities". >> What do you think? >> >> +1 >> >> >> Léonie. >> >> >> -- >> @LeonieWatson tink.uk <http://tink.uk> Carpe diem >> >> >> >> >> -- >> Shane McCarron >> Projects Manager, Spec-Ops >> > -- Shane McCarron Projects Manager, Spec-Ops
Received on Wednesday, 10 August 2016 22:24:36 UTC