- From: Francois Daoust <fd@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2016 17:24:22 +0200
- To: <public-apa@w3.org>
- Cc: "'Kostiainen, Anssi'" <anssi.kostiainen@intel.com>
Dear APA Working Group, We noticed that you completed the accessibility review of the Presentation API on your side. On behalf of the Second Screen Working Group, I'd like to thank you for this review! Looking at the observations you made in this review [1], I can only confirm the answers to the questions and comments that you raised. Notably, the references to "using an implementation specific mechanism" are connection related, not UI related (such phrases make testing hard, but that is another topic); and presentations are indeed expected to be rendered as web pages. Your "no-op" conclusions also match ours, which is of course excellent news :) Can you confirm that we may close the accessibility review issue on our side with no changes to the spec? We will of course keep you informed about changes made to the specification. The Second Screen Working Group does not anticipate any major update at this stage and plans to publish a Candidate Recommendation as soon as possible once remaining issues are fixed. Many thanks, François, Staff Contact for the Second Screen Working Group [1] https://www.w3.org/WAI/APA/wiki/Presentation_API
Received on Wednesday, 13 April 2016 15:24:37 UTC