W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-annotea-dev@w3.org > January to March 2004

Fwd: efficient retrieval of annotation bodies in Annotea

From: Marja-Riitta Koivunen <marja@annotea.org>
Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2004 16:52:06 -0500
Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.0.20040327165159.04b9ef90@mail.annotea.org>
To: public-annotea-dev@w3.org

Forwarded to continue this discussion here.

Marja

>Delivered-To: marja@annotea.org
>X-Original-To: www-annotation+aa@listhub.w3.org
>Delivered-To: www-annotation+aa@listhub.w3.org
>X-Original-To: www-annotation@listhub.w3.org
>Delivered-To: www-annotation@listhub.w3.org
>Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2004 15:53:21 -0500
>From: Mark Smith <mcs@pearlcrescent.com>
>User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.4) 
>Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 (ax)
>X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
>To: www-annotation@w3.org
>X-caa-id: d8088c80a5b159437ff5c3e883b3193140ce7ef9
>Subject: efficient retrieval of annotation bodies in Annotea
>X-Archived-At: http://www.w3.org/mid/405B5DC1.2080208@pearlcrescent.com
>Resent-From: www-annotation@w3.org
>X-Mailing-List: <www-annotation@w3.org> archive/latest/942
>X-Loop: www-annotation@w3.org
>Sender: www-annotation-request@w3.org
>Resent-Sender: www-annotation-request@w3.org
>List-Id: <www-annotation.w3.org>
>List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
>List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:www-annotation-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>
>Resent-Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2004 15:55:28 -0500 (EST)
>X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on
>         mailsmtp.opentransfer.com
>X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.9 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
>         version=2.63
>X-Spam-Level:
>
>
>[Please accept my apologies if this has already been discussed; I did not 
>find it in the list archives.]
>
>I have been looking at the Annotea protocol, and it seems that one HTTP 
>GET request must be issued to retrieve each annotation body.  If a client 
>wants to retrieve the list of annotations for a page as well as all of the 
>associated bodies, it can't do so very efficiently.  Or did I miss 
>something in the spec?
>
>Are people open to extending the protocol to allow this kind of query? If 
>so, I'd be happy to experiment a bit and propose something concrete.
>
>Reference: http://www.w3.org/2002/12/AnnoteaProtocol-20021219
>
>--
>Mark Smith
>LDAP Book Information: http://www.ldapbook.com/
>What's Next:           http://www.pearlcrescent.com/
>
Received on Saturday, 27 March 2004 16:50:20 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 6 April 2009 12:36:55 GMT