W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-annotea-dev@w3.org > April to June 2004

Re: updated URN&URI doc

From: Jose Kahan <jose.kahan@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 6 May 2004 12:41:11 +0200
To: Marja-Riitta Koivunen <marja@annotea.org>
Cc: public-annotea-dev@w3.org
Message-ID: <20040506104111.GA2465@inrialpes.fr>


Thanks for the changes. See comments below.

On Wed, May 05, 2004 at 10:06:58AM -0400, Marja-Riitta Koivunen wrote:
> I updated
> http://www.w3.org/2003/12/20-local-global.html
> to hopefully reflect what you want to do e.g. first just have a URN and 
> then change the file to have HTTP URI and refer to URN with owl:sameAs. 
> This means that if I have a local bookmark file I need to use Annotea 
> knowledgeable tools for conversion before I publish it or to do the 
> combined conversion and publishing.

This convertion is to be done intentionally by the server, if it
decides to assign a new URL. The client is not expected to do it at
this moment. This gives the freedom for exchanging the bookmark 
files thru any means, such as e-mail, ftp, scp, HTTP PUT, ... 
without having to go thru a specialized RDF store. Of course, if the
client does the convertion there's no problem, but it's not necessary
to do it to exploit a bookmark file.

> I did not yet change the fragment URIs in the examples to full URIs as I 
> think both can be used and they have their benefits. But that is an easy 
> change to make.

I'd like to have the document reflect the state of what we're going
to implement rather than diverge. If you want to have those fragment
ID's, please make a case for them. Otherwise, it's better to remove
them if this document is intended to report on our modeling and
implementation choice.

Received on Thursday, 6 May 2004 06:43:01 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 19:42:12 UTC