Re: iggy test server installed

Eric,

I think the problem is in my test Amaya version as I can see the annotation 
with an older stable Amaya version. (We did not have any problems with the 
DC 1.1 annotations even with the older servers just with the DC 1.1 replies 
that used dc properties in the query.)

I will probably need a corrected Amaya test version before I can continue 
testing iggy.

I did notice that in 
http://iggy.w3.org/annotations/annotation/1083156542.499364 the annotation 
is using DC 1.0 for the creator when it uses DC 1.1 for everything else but 
while we do want to correct that to make the conversion final, the queries 
should still work.

Marja

At 09:07 AM 4/28/2004 -0400, Marja-Riitta Koivunen wrote:

>Thanks Eric!
>
>I tested it today and something is still wrong. Not sure if it is the 
>server or the Amaya version.
>
>I do an annotation and post it to iggy.
>
>Everything looks fine except that when I look the document info at 
>annotation window it gives me a local address instead of an iggy address. 
>However, when I close the annotation window the pencil icon disappears.
>
>Did you change the way Amaya is supposed to ask for the annotations now? 
>Maybe you could check with Jose that part.
>
>Here is an annotation on iggy that I made with the 
>/usr/local/Amaya/GTK/bin/amaya
>
>http://iggy.w3.org/annotations/annotation/1083156542.499364
>
>It looks OK to me in the query interface except that IE cannot open the 
>body when I click the link (I think we had fixed this IE MIME type problem).
>
>Marja
>
>At 08:03 PM 4/25/2004 -0400, Eric Prud'hommeaux wrote:
>
>>i updated the code on iggy. it might even work now!
>>--
>>-eric
>>
>>office: +81.466.49.1170 W3C, Keio Research Institute at SFC,
>>                         Shonan Fujisawa Campus, Keio University,
>>                         5322 Endo, Fujisawa, Kanagawa 252-8520
>>                         JAPAN
>>         +1.617.258.5741 NE43-344, MIT, Cambridge, MA 02144 USA
>>cell:   +1.857.222.5741 (does not work in Asia)
>>
>>(eric@w3.org)
>>Feel free to forward this message to any list for any purpose other than
>>email address distribution.
>
>

Received on Wednesday, 28 April 2004 10:01:08 UTC