Re: Editorial woes

Robert,

Can you please confirm whether or not you are still seeing this problem?

On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 3:45 PM, Robert Sanderson <azaroth42@gmail.com>
wrote:

>
> Tried refreshing, tried an older version, tried all the basic tricks to no
> avail :(
>
> On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 10:43 PM, Siegman, Tzviya - Hoboken <
> tsiegman@wiley.com> wrote:
>
>> Is this the same broken that a few of us were experiencing earlier this
>> week? For whatever reason, refreshing the browser “fixed” it. Shane was
>> working on the issue.
>>
>>
>>
>> *Tzviya Siegman*
>>
>> Information Standards Lead
>>
>> Wiley
>>
>> 201-748-6884
>>
>> tsiegman@wiley.com
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* Robert Sanderson [mailto:azaroth42@gmail.com]
>> *Sent:* Friday, October 28, 2016 4:39 PM
>> *To:* Web Annotation
>> *Subject:* Editorial woes
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> The live W3C respec code is broken, and the older version I have on disk
>> doesn't work with the newer remote libraries :(
>>
>>
>>
>> Until this is fixed, we can't generate the specs ... and until that's
>> done we can't merge the vocab PR that's a prerequisite for the remaining
>> issues.
>>
>>
>>
>> I had been intending to work on them this afternoon (e.g. now) but unless
>> it's fixed by Monday, it won't be until the 7th of November before I have a
>> chance due to travel.
>>
>>
>>
>> Rob
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> Rob Sanderson
>>
>> Semantic Architect
>>
>> The Getty Trust
>>
>> Los Angeles, CA 90049
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Rob Sanderson
> Semantic Architect
> The Getty Trust
> Los Angeles, CA 90049
>



-- 
Shane McCarron
Projects Manager, Spec-Ops

Received on Monday, 31 October 2016 13:34:50 UTC