Re: RN Annotation Results integrated

> On 18 Nov 2016, at 10:19, Shane McCarron <shane@spec-ops.io> wrote:
> 
> Normal?  Perhaps not.  I mean - remember the RI is ONLY a protocol server, so it serves up pages and a container.  That is what is being tested.  Not annotations.  It is not a client.

I am not sure I understand. RI appears in the model report, ie, if it is in the protocol only, then it should not appear in the model report…

I.

> 
> On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 8:31 AM, Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org <mailto:ivan@w3.org>> wrote:
> Great!
> 
> But… is it normal to have a 'reference implementation' with a fully yellow entries?
> 
> Ivan
> 
>> On 17 Nov 2016, at 14:51, Shane McCarron <shane@spec-ops.io <mailto:shane@spec-ops.io>> wrote:
>> 
>> Another implementation in the report at [1]!
>> 
>> [1] https://w3c.github.io/test-results/annotation-model/all.html <https://w3c.github.io/test-results/annotation-model/all.html>
>> 
>> --
>> Shane McCarron
>> Projects Manager, Spec-Ops
> 
> 
> ----
> Ivan Herman, W3C
> Digital Publishing Technical Lead
> Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ <http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/>
> mobile: +31-641044153 <tel:%2B31-641044153>
> ORCID ID: http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0782-2704 <http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0782-2704>
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> --
> Shane McCarron
> Projects Manager, Spec-Ops


----
Ivan Herman, W3C
Digital Publishing Technical Lead
Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
mobile: +31-641044153
ORCID ID: http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0782-2704