Re: Web Anno Agenda: Telco - 2016-11-11

Regrets, holidays.

Kind regards,
Ben

Ben De Meester
Researcher Semantic Web
Ghent University - iMinds - Data Science Lab | Faculty of Engineering and
Architecture | Department of Electronics and Information Systems
Sint-Pietersnieuwstraat 41, 9000 Ghent, Belgium
t: +32 9 331 49 59 | e: ben.demeester@ugent.be | URL:
http://users.ugent.be/~bjdmeest/

2016-11-10 21:38 GMT+01:00 Tim Cole <t-cole3@illinois.edu>:

> Web Annotation Working Group Teleconference Agenda for Friday November 11
> 2016
>
> (11am Eastern US, 8am Pacific US, 16:00 UTC -- Note US & most of Europe
> are now both on 'winter' time; for those in locales that do not change to
> winter time, call time starting tomorrow will be one hour later than during
> the summer).
>
>
>
> *Logistics / Call in details:*
>
> - IRC channel ( irc.w3.org  ): #annotation.
>
> - WebEx via computer:
>
>    https://mit.webex.com/mit/j.php?MTID=m2c99abd2f8cea21e3e3c33c9c2626eec
>
>
>                or direct dial in: +1-617-324-0000
>
> *  Meeting Number / Access Code*: 645 413 954
>
>
>
> Agenda (Chairs:  Tim Cole,  Rob Sanderson):
>
>
>
> 1. Scribe Selection, Agenda Review, Announcements, Minutes Approval
>
>    PROPOSED RESOLUTION: Minutes of the previous call are approved:
> https://www.w3.org/2016/10/28-annotation-minutes.html
>
>
>
> 2. Issue Updates, if any
>
>
>
> 3. Implementation / Testing Status -
>
>     For which features do we NOT yet have 2 implementations? As of last
> week we were lacking 2 implementations for:
>
>    -  A Choice of resources, used as the Body of an Annotation
>
>    -  A Choice of resources, used as the Target of an Annotation
>
>    -  [creator for] … a resource used as the Body of an Annotation.
>
>    -  [creator for] … a resource used as the Target of an Annotation.
>
>       DECISION - do we need to remove or put in non-normative appendix any
> of these features and extend CR? If so, need to make this decision during
> the call, if possible.
>
>
>
>    Because the tests were late getting deployed, we also do not yet have a
> test result report showing 2 implementations of Annotation Collections and
> Annotation Pages, but we believe we have at least 2 compliant
> implementations.
>
>
>
> 4. Finalizing reports and other information needed for request to exit CR
>
>      A preliminary Google sheet provides current snapshot of mapping
> between Model exit criteria and individual sub-tests / assertions:
>
>      https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1PKpODhRgecp7Vl8GfJIl0xL3gH_
> eJMTcogCdBKT1dQg/edit?usp=sharing
>
>
>
>     For reporting, we will need to roll up multiple annotations from
> single implementation.
>
>
>
>    Need to review status of protocol testing report
>
>
>
>     What else is needed to get test reports ready to document readiness to
> exit CR?
>
>
>
>    NB: the template we need to fill in as part of process to exit CR is
> here:
>
>    https://github.com/w3c/web-annotation/blob/gh-pages/
> admin/PRTransitionAdmin/PRTransitionRequest.md
>
>
>
> Time allowing, we will revisit:
>
>
>
> 5. Post WG planning (errata maintenance)
>
>
>
> 6. WG Notes
>
>
>
> 7. AOB
>
>    Next meeting?
>
>
>
> 8. Adjourn
>
>
>