Re: [web-annotation] Relationship between Motivations and Actions (from schema.org)

I cannot disagree with the idea of mapping out the overlap and see 
where we lack expressiveness. In general we always tried to be very 
high level to avoid slippery slopes of custom/peculiar/arguable 
motivations. 

While I 'like' vs '+1' is a trivial example (in SKOS that would be an 
easy relationship to express as well), for other terms things might 
become a little more difficult. 

After a quick look, these are the interesting one for me:

- Assess Action
  - React Action
    - AgreeAction
    - DisagreeAction
    - DislikeAction
    - EndorseAction
    - LikeAction
  - Review Action
  - Choose Action
  - Vote Action
- Organize Action
  - Bookmark Action
- Update Action
  - Add
  - Delete
  - Replace
- Achieve Action (not that sure about these)
  - Win
  - Lose
  - Tie
- Interact Action
  - Follow
  - Communicate
     - Ask
     - Comment
     - Inform
     - Reply
     - Share
     - Invite (?)

Any other that make sense?






-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by paolociccarese
Please view or discuss this issue at 
https://github.com/w3c/web-annotation/issues/248#issuecomment-222679175
 using your GitHub account

Received on Tuesday, 31 May 2016 12:53:25 UTC