- From: gsergiu via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 24 May 2016 08:46:20 +0000
- To: public-annotation@w3.org
It seems to me that this ticket started from a wrong example:
```
"text" : "<p>פעילות הבינאום, W3C</p>",
"format" : "text/html",
"language" : "en"
"direction" : "rtl"
```
In the provided example, the language is not "en" according to my
understanding, but hebrew, with some enghlish text (except if the
provided hebrew text means W3C ... for which we would have 50% en and
50% hebrew).
I think it is dangerous to make standardization decisions starting
from wrong examples, and proposing incomplete solutions.
1. Probalby you want to say that W3c should be understood as "en"
text, even if it would match any latin based language+script, but that
doesn't change the true nature of the text!
2. The text is written in 2 languages, and 2 scripts .. and the
proposed "base direction "change doesn't solve the problem of not
being able to correctly represent the text. see also the analysis I
submitted to #213
--
GitHub Notification of comment by gsergiu
Please view or discuss this issue at
https://github.com/w3c/web-annotation/issues/224#issuecomment-221204794
using your GitHub account
Received on Tuesday, 24 May 2016 08:46:21 UTC