- From: Ivan Herman via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 23 May 2016 18:03:41 +0000
- To: public-annotation@w3.org
+1 > On 23 May 2016, at 19:39, Rob Sanderson <notifications@github.com> wrote: > > We heard several times last week that there was confusion as to why the bodyValue text must be treated as commenting, rather than simply following the motivation for the Annotation. > > As purpose is not required for TextualBody, there's no way to introspect on the bodyValue to figure out what it should be, we heard a lot of requests for using it for plain text tagging ... I propose to remove the restriction that the purpose must be considered to be commenting. A system encountering an annotation with a motivation that isn't commenting and with bodyValue would not know what to do. > -- GitHub Notification of comment by iherman Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/web-annotation/issues/240#issuecomment-221048216 using your GitHub account
Received on Monday, 23 May 2016 18:03:44 UTC