- From: BigBlueHat via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 02 Jun 2016 21:36:00 +0000
- To: public-annotation@w3.org
@azaroth42 @tilgovi @paolociccarese @iherman do you all remember this discussion from January per chance? :wink: Think it's going to trip up more than me. I'd vote for either `nickname` (for clarity over `nick`) or switching to `alternateName`. >From [FoaF](http://xmlns.com/foaf/spec/#term_nick): > Property: foaf:nick > nickname - A short informal nickname characterising an agent (includes login identifiers, IRC and other chat nicknames). (see...they even use `nickname` in the description! :wink: ) >From [Schema.org](https://schema.org/alternateName): > An alias for the item. I'd vote for `nickname` in the JSON-LD replacing `account` and keeping the mapping to `foaf:nick` (as `schema:alternateName` seems less...committal. :grin: @iherman @azaroth42 I'm only not re-opening this as I'm not sure what the proper policy/process is in cases like this one. (apologies if I'm Doing It Wrong) -- GitHub Notification of comment by BigBlueHat Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/web-annotation/issues/130#issuecomment-223430085 using your GitHub account
Received on Thursday, 2 June 2016 21:36:04 UTC