Re: [web-annotation] Definitions of Specific Resources: Example

Agree that this is an issue. The editorial issue is that by the time 
we get to just Section 4.  (e.g. where the example is) we haven't 
introduced any of the specifiers (State, Selector, etc.) so it seems 
weird to have them in the example.

I suggest the easiest and least confusing correction is to remove the 
example and the use case, but to leave the basic model components. 
Then have a note that functionally complete examples are in the 
sub-sections below.  Would that satisfy the concern, @gsergiu? 

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by azaroth42
Please view or discuss this issue at 
https://github.com/w3c/web-annotation/issues/138#issuecomment-172128367
 using your GitHub account

Received on Friday, 15 January 2016 23:49:15 UTC