Re: [web-annotation] Keeping the OA ontology up to date

Agree that we need namespace doc/ontology to enter CR, obviously it 
would
then need to be in sync with CR specs :)

Deliverable wise, are we going for a simple HTML page as well as the
different RDF formats on content negotiation? Aka 
https://www.w3.org/ns/prov

Or more like a specification on its own, like 
https://www.w3.org/TR/prov-o/
?
On 24 Feb 2016 05:42, "Ivan Herman" <notifications@github.com> wrote:

> @azaroth42 <https://github.com/azaroth42> not clear what postpone 
means
> in this case. I presume implementations depend on the namespace 
document,
> ie, it must be o.k. *when we enter CR*. If you mean, by postpone, 
wait
> until then, that is of course fine. But I think we do need it to 
enter CR.
>
> —
> Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
> 
<https://github.com/w3c/web-annotation/issues/66#issuecomment-188084160>.
>


-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by stain
Please view or discuss this issue at 
https://github.com/w3c/web-annotation/issues/66#issuecomment-188161712
 using your GitHub account

Received on Wednesday, 24 February 2016 09:34:00 UTC