- From: Hugo Manguinhas via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2016 09:39:57 +0000
- To: public-annotation@w3.org
Hi all, I must say that I was much more comfortable with the way OA was being designed especially for Tags and Semantic Tags where classes were being used to categorize the body... representing a state rather than an action/intent/role... for that we already have motivation expressed at the level of the Annotation, which is where (in my opinion) should stay and remember that it can be repeated. I share the opinion with @gsergiu btw that having tagging in both motivation and role is, say the least confusing. So, why not just use @type? For now, we are considering very simple annotations, but more complex annotations will require much more elaborate bodies conveying much more information than just a mere resource. Best regards, Hugo -- GitHub Notification of comment by hugomanguinhas Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/web-annotation/issues/112#issuecomment-185118843 using your GitHub account
Received on Wednesday, 17 February 2016 09:39:58 UTC