- From: Melvin Carvalho via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2015 21:05:40 +0000
- To: public-annotation@w3.org
@azaroth42 FWIW I am also an independent developer that has participated in W3C WG's. Im not employed to do so, but I like to implement things that solve problems in a practical way. Normally I will just try and choose the tool that will solve use cases in the fastest possible way. My personal preference is turtle right now, with JSON LD not far behind. I dont say this from any academic or theoretical standpoint. Just experience of trial and error. Linked data is still really new in terms of things implemented, I think we're still around the time of geocities in web history. It can be frustrating when hearing things like 'developers will/wont do X ...' -- when actually we've never really been asked and there's not good data to back up or counter act pre conceived notions (normally from people that have never even implemented a user table using linked data). I'm very interested in the work of the WG, and would be looking to take pieces of it for a system I'm working on. I'd be really happy to use primarily turtle, secondarily JSON LD. Just my 2 cents. -- GitHub Notif of comment by melvincarvalho See https://github.com/w3c/web-annotation/issues/34#issuecomment-139378526
Received on Thursday, 10 September 2015 21:05:42 UTC