Re: [web-annotation] is, has and alike are implied

I should add that, if the possibility of the namespace changing comes 
down to this issue alone, I would much prefer to drop this issue 
altogether and live with the existing terms.

-- 
GitHub Notif of comment by csarven
See 
https://github.com/w3c/web-annotation/issues/70#issuecomment-139016815

Received on Wednesday, 9 September 2015 19:12:05 UTC