- From: Jacob via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2015 14:51:27 +0000
- To: public-annotation@w3.org
+1 for cleaning up the cardinality requirements. I'd also like to add an observation that I thought one of the use cases that "roles" (or purposes) and motivations are intended to service is retrieval of annotations by "kind", i.e., there're like *fuzzy classes*. E.g., one can search for all "editing" annotations or annotation bodies and get them back from a search feature. IMO, it's a information retrieval (IR) system design best practice to allow for more than one "kind" to be asserted as it allows relevant (and probably even pertinent) search results to returned for multiple kinds of queries. So I'd be -1 for either motivation or "role" / purpose (whatever we finally decide to call it) to be 0 or 1 properties as it'll be a serious drag on search functionality. -- GitHub Notification of comment by jjett Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/web-annotation/issues/104#issuecomment-160651671 using your GitHub account
Received on Monday, 30 November 2015 14:51:30 UTC