Re: [web-annotation] http/https?

+1 to serving secure `http` - as opposed to `https` - resources (since
 TLS is on a lower level any way). The catch is that, existing 
tooling/UI gives special treatment to `https`. On the other hand, 
serving secure `http` may quietly workaround (for better or worse) 
mixed content, .., sticking to singular vocabulary IRIs (as opposed to
 redirecting or mapping between `http` and `https`).

-- 
GitHub Notif of comment by csarven
See 
https://github.com/w3c/web-annotation/issues/103#issuecomment-154421383

Received on Friday, 6 November 2015 14:25:53 UTC