Re: Updated Protocol draft available

Thanks Ed!

There was a call recently about Authentication/Authorization, and also this
thread:
  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-annotation/2015Jun/0014.html

The upshot (I think) is that we're not far enough along to make any
tentative recommendations in that space, and by putting anything into FPWD
*all* of the feedback would be about auth'n / auth'z and not the actual
protocol interactions.  That said, I agree it's important to cover as there
will be zero practical implementations that allow creation/deletion of
annotations without some authentication system.

Rob


On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 3:10 PM, Ed Summers <ehs@pobox.com> wrote:

> Hi Rob,
>
> I only took a quick look, but it seemed like there was no mention of
> authentication. I can understand why it would be desirable to remain
> agnostic, but shouldn’t there at least be some discussion? Perhaps
> something similar in spirit to what’s in RFC 5023 [1] would work?
>
> //Ed
>
> [1] https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5023#section-14
> > On Jun 17, 2015, at 8:07 PM, Robert Sanderson <azaroth42@GMAIL.COM>
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > Changes include especially clarity around 4.1.4 and added section 5 on
> Error conditions.
> > Other minor tweaks and typo fixes.
> >
> > http://w3c.github.io/web-annotation/protocol/wd/
> >
> > Comments welcome as always and CFC to publish as FPWD coming soon
> >
> > Rob
> >
> > --
> > Rob Sanderson
> > Information Standards Advocate
> > Digital Library Systems and Services
> > Stanford, CA 94305
>
>


-- 
Rob Sanderson
Information Standards Advocate
Digital Library Systems and Services
Stanford, CA 94305