- From: Frederick Hirsch <w3c@fjhirsch.com>
- Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2015 19:50:49 -0400
- To: W3C Public Annotation List <public-annotation@w3.org>
below is submitted response to TR design survey. If any corrections or additions needed, please let me know. Deadline is 7/7 but would need in June to complete on time. especially if you know of custom CSS, table needs, or have details to share related to tabbed views thanks regards, Frederick Frederick Hirsch Co-Chair, W3C Web Annotation WG www.fjhirsch.com @fjhirsch > Begin forwarded message: > > From: sysbot+wbs@w3.org (Frederick Hirsch via WBS Mailer) > Subject: [wbs] response to 'TR Design Survey' > Date: June 10, 2015 at 7:48:01 PM EDT > To: w3c@fjhirsch.com,www-archive@w3.org > Reply-To: w3c@fjhirsch.com > > The following answers have been successfully submitted to 'TR Design Survey' > (public) for Frederick Hirsch. > >> >> --------------------------------- >> Group >> ---- >> >> On behalf of which W3C Working Group are you answering this survey? >> >> >> > > Web Annotation WG, http://www.w3.org/annotation/ > > >> >> >> --------------------------------- >> Sample(s) >> ---- >> Paste in URLs to a representative sample (1-3 links) of your specs. If >> styling differs substantially between /TR and your editor's drafts, >> please link to both versions. >> >> > > Web Annotation Data Model > http://www.w3.org/TR/2014/WD-annotation-model-20141211/ (FPWD) > > RangeFinder API http://w3c.github.io/web-annotation/api/rangefinder/ > (Editors Draft) > > Web Annotation Protocol http://w3c.github.io/web-annotation/protocol/wd/ > ( Editors Draft ) > >> >> >> --------------------------------- >> Specification Processor(s) >> ---- >> What spec pre-processor(s) does your WG use? >> >> > > ReSpec > >> >> >> --------------------------------- >> Group style sheet(s) >> ---- >> Paste in URLs to any WG-specific style sheets you use. >> >> > > > >> >> >> --------------------------------- >> Like >> ---- >> What do you like about your current styles? >> >> > > familiar > >> >> >> --------------------------------- >> Dislike >> ---- >> What do you dislike about your current styles? >> >> > > not sure > >> >> >> --------------------------------- >> Complex style >> ---- >> Paste in URLs to any parts of your spec that are stylistically complex or >> tricky, and we should therefore be careful not to screw up. >> >> > > views switching - toggle between tabs; Ability to have tabbed views for > different representations (e.g. turtle, JSON-LD etc in Data Model, see end > of http://www.w3.org/TR/2014/WD-annotation-model-20141211/#annotation ) > >> >> >> --------------------------------- >> Table style >> ---- >> The new styles will include rules for rendering data tables. These will >> be opt-in by class name, and rely heavily on good markup (use of THEAD, >> TBODY, COLGROUP, scope attributes, etc.). See Simple Example, Less Simple >> Example, and Extra-Complex Example. Paste in URLs to a sampling of any >> data tables you are using so that we can try to accommodate those in the >> styling, if practical. >> >> > > not sure > >> >> >> --------------------------------- >> CSS WG Style >> ---- >> The CSSWG has made a number of minor improvements to the existing spec >> styles, which we might just adopt wholesale. Please comment on what you >> like/dislike about these styles, as demonstrated in the CSS3 Text >> specification. >> >> > > not sure > >> >> >> --------------------------------- >> Anything else? >> ---- >> >> Is there anything else we should consider? >> >> >> > > ability to make specs with narrower text region, wider margins, to enhance > readability or to enable annotations in the margin area > > eventually to allow general application of annotations to documents > >> >> These answers were last modified on 10 June 2015 at 23:47:46 U.T.C. >> by Frederick Hirsch >> > Answers to this questionnaire can be set and changed at > https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/1/tr-design-survey-2015/ until 2015-07-07. > > Regards, > > The Automatic WBS Mailer >
Received on Wednesday, 10 June 2015 23:51:23 UTC