Re: [web-annotation] "Open" or "Web" Annotation

+1 to this.

My previous +1 should be read as agreeing with the more general name change
of the spec itself.

On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 1:00 PM, raydAtLC via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
wrote:

> Based on today’s discussion (on the call)  in my opinion keeping the
> namespace is the way to go.  Tim’s argument convinced me: While the
> new spec will not be backward compatible – which is the argument for a
>  new namespace -two namespaces could result in two divergent specs,
> while a single namespace is more likely to encourage those who have
> already implemented the old spec to make the necessary adjustments.
> Rob’s observation that the old spec is only a draft strengthens the
> argument to keep the namespace.
>
> --
> GitHub Notif of comment by raydAtLC
> See
> https://github.com/w3c/web-annotation/issues/46#issuecomment-119679105
>
>