- From: Ivan Herman via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 03 Jul 2015 08:22:25 +0000
- To: public-annotation@w3.org
There have already been discussions that may lead to (minor, but nevertheless existing) changes in spec. On the other hand, the WG's document has no official trace back to the OADM, and this may lead to confusion. Consequently, changing the name of the document seems to be a cleaner way forward. I am sensitive to the namespace issue but, in fact, the same issue applies. The namespace may change (maybe some domain or range specifications will change, for example), so having a new namespace set at the beginning of the work is a small investment that may pay off in the future. RDF based implementations can simply change a URI in the namespace declaration, nobody forces them to change the prefix, ie, it does not seem to be a hugely expensive move (though indeed a pain). Bottom line: I am in favour of the change, even if I realize it is not an obvious move. -- GitHub Notif of comment by iherman See https://github.com/w3c/web-annotation/issues/46#issuecomment-118272210
Received on Friday, 3 July 2015 08:22:27 UTC