Re: Old spec easier to find...

+1 ... other than Protocol, which is not yet FPWD and hence shouldn't be
listed yet.

Rob

On Mon, Feb 2, 2015 at 1:05 PM, Denenberg, Ray <rden@loc.gov> wrote:

> What I would suggest is to move this sentence up:
>
>
>
> “This group works in public, with details in the WG's* Work Mode* document
> <https://www.w3.org/annotation/wiki/Work_Mode> and the WG's Wiki
> <https://www.w3.org/annotation/wiki/>.”
>
>
>
> Move it up so it immediately follows the enumerated list (“The chartered
> specs consist of:”)   and is addition provide links as well to the most
> relevant current documents, which right now I suppose are the model and
> protocol.
>
>
>
> Ray
>
>
>
> *From:* Benjamin Young [mailto:bigbluehat@hypothes.is]
> *Sent:* Monday, February 02, 2015 3:37 PM
> *To:* W3C Public Annotation List
> *Subject:* Old spec easier to find...
>
>
>
> Of someone visits
> http://www.w3.org/annotation/
>
> They'll be quickly lead to
> http://www.openannotation.org/spec/core/
>
> And find it *much* harder to find the FPWD.
>
> Can this be fixed? Our is it intentional?
>
> Thanks!
> Benjamin
>



-- 
Rob Sanderson
Information Standards Advocate
Digital Library Systems and Services
Stanford, CA 94305