- From: gsergiu via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2015 11:18:30 +0000
- To: public-annotation@w3.org
well .. I would expect to have a controlled vocabulary for Motivation that can be accessed in a machine readable format (skos.xml is one possible, or the preffered option). Yes .. I saw the mechanism for extending Motivations, which indeeed recommends to create norrower terms and I appreciate that. Still the question about the current list remains. Are these disjoint Concepts? For example: commenting, editing, describing, questioning, reviewing ... If they are not disjoint, and there is a relathipnship between them, why is this not represented in the model? -- GitHub Notification of comment by gsergiu Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/web-annotation/issues/113#issuecomment-165427056 using your GitHub account
Received on Thursday, 17 December 2015 11:18:38 UTC