- From: Ivan Herman via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2015 18:50:00 +0000
- To: public-annotation@w3.org
> On 16 Dec 2015, at 18:59, Doug Schepers <notifications@github.com> wrote: > > The proposals miss the actual current proposal of using a profile: the media type > would be application/ld+json;profile="http://www.w3.org/ns/anno.jsonld" > > Where was this proposal made? Is it implicit in #30? If so, then it should be made more explicit. (During the telcon, the response to my question was that the MIME type is orthogonal to the profile suggestion in #30.) > It *is* proposal #30. That is what profile means, as I also explained on the call. That is what we voted on. The question is whether there would be *another* mime type. Ivan -- GitHub Notification of comment by iherman Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/web-annotation/issues/125#issuecomment-165209221 using your GitHub account
Received on Wednesday, 16 December 2015 18:50:05 UTC