- From: gsergiu via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2015 12:21:50 +0000
- To: public-annotation@w3.org
I give a +1 to @shepazu 's proposal. basin on my comment in #112 By now ... motivation has near 0 value for the computer and a vague clue for to the user, indicating why another user chose to create the annotation... (by now ... motivation seems to be nothing more than a simple tag ...) In my opinion motivation values should come from a controlled vocabulary, which define clear meanings for the machines (e.g. see for example the simple embedded tagging vs. semantic tagging problem). I do support the idea that the Motivation should encapsulate the concrete relationships between body, target and external resources. In my opinion, the old definition/explanation of annotation stating 'the body is most frequently somehow "about" the target' starts to get deprecated. With the introduction of "roles", the specification starts to emphasize that: "The exact nature of this relationship changes according to the intention of the annotation". (in which I suppose that the intention is what we store in the motivation field).... Br, Sergiu -- GitHub Notification of comment by gsergiu Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/web-annotation/issues/113#issuecomment-165090728 using your GitHub account
Received on Wednesday, 16 December 2015 12:21:52 UTC