- From: Sarven Capadisli via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 01 Dec 2015 21:04:25 +0000
- To: public-annotation@w3.org
1. The issue asks to document an embedded annotation in target. I have provided one. Have I misunderstood what the issue is asking for? What I was merely seeking was a way to "enrich" - if you want to call it that - the target by making the human-readable part as an RDF label. To simplify my example above, it covers cases where anyone, e.g., authors, editors, with the write access to say an HTML+RDFa document (e.g., the body and target are in the same document) can annotate. 2. @iherman If my example above is on track with this issue, then by my understanding, your statement "That extra triple is, in a sense, completely outside of the annotation structure" is in conflict with this issue :) Having said that, I did realize the importance of your point, and it made me re-question the whole thing on whether we want to have targets "annotated" at all. Or is it an exercise of just linking out to it i.e., hasTarget <IRI>. -- GitHub Notification of comment by csarven Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/web-annotation/issues/87#issuecomment-161095259 using your GitHub account
Received on Tuesday, 1 December 2015 21:04:27 UTC