- From: Ivan Herman via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2015 15:23:52 +0000
- To: public-annotation@w3.org
> Defaults, especially in the open world, seem very risky. I actually think that HTML will be the most common, because most annotations will be created in HTML based environments, and people will want to add at least basic styling. That may be true. > For literals, do you mean the literal body per http://www.w3.org/TR/annotation-model/#simple-textual-body ? That already has a requirement that the literal is xsd:string in the first bullet. Yes. Hm. The problem comes, actually, from (surprise, surprise) Tim's examples on the multiple body issue. If you look at [the example](https://www.w3.org/annotation/wiki/Expressing_Role_in_Multi-Body_Annotations#.C2.A0.C2.A0Role_Attached_to_EmbeddedContent_and_SpecificResource) on the wiki, what was a plain string (ie, a simple textual body) is turned into an Embedded Content and it then has to have (well, SHOULD have) a format which was unnecessary in the simple case (and also the language but I believe that could be dropped anyway). Ie, it makes all this multi-body problem even more complex. That is what triggered my issue... -- GitHub Notif of comment by iherman See https://github.com/w3c/web-annotation/issues/63#issuecomment-131147722
Received on Friday, 14 August 2015 15:23:55 UTC