> On 05 Aug 2015, at 16:48 , Denenberg, Ray <rden@loc.gov> wrote: > > From: Ivan Herman [mailto:ivan@w3.org] >> what we say, in human terms, that the subject of a triple with the predicate >> hasRoleAssignment is an annotation, and its object is an 'Assignment', and the >> predicates refer back to the subject of the hasRoleAssignment. > > However, if the RoleAssignment becomes a resource - an independent resource -- then the RoleAssignment becomes the subject of triples, with (potentially) no connection to the annotation. potentially: yes. But that is would be a bug. But one can mitigate the issue. There is a separate Working Group running right now (RDF Data Shapes WG[1]) that will provide means to control the structures of the data to see if there is a discrepancy. (Today, based on the the definition of the right domain and range specifications, and some additional OWL definitions, complex Semantic Web reasoners can also detect some inconsistencies, but there are only a few being able to do so.) Although the Data Shapes work is ongoing, we do not have to have a normative dependency on what they do, so it should be o.k. Ivan [1] http://www.w3.org/2014/data-shapes/ > > > Rob - can you weigh in on this? Am I wrong? > > Ray > ---- Ivan Herman, W3C Digital Publishing Activity Lead Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ mobile: +31-641044153 ORCID ID: http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0782-2704
Received on Wednesday, 5 August 2015 14:58:59 UTC