Thanks for the pointer, Nick. I didn't realize it was that messy... Ivan --- Ivan Herman Tel:+31 641044153 http://www.ivan-herman.net (Written on mobile, sorry for brevity and misspellings...) > On 15 Oct 2014, at 02:01, Randall Leeds <randall@bleeds.info> wrote: > >> On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 10:37 AM, Nick Stenning <nick@whiteink.com> wrote: >> On Tue, Oct 14, 2014, at 18:58, Doug Schepers wrote: >> > Hi, Rob– >> > >> > Small comment... >> > >> > On 10/14/14 12:08 PM, Robert Sanderson wrote: >> > > >> > > And my concerns with characterEncoding: >> > > >> > > 4. The encoding should be UTF-8 regardless. >> > >> > UTF-8 is not always sufficient. For some Asian scripts, you sometimes >> > need UTF-16. >> >> UTF-8 can encode any unicode code point. UTF-16 may be more space >> efficient for Japanese, Chinese, Thai, characters, but you don't "need" >> UTF-8 in order to encode those scripts. >> >> But Doug probably knows things I don't. Do some user agents not support >> asian script codepoint entry in UTF-8? > > In case anyone loves reading about these things: https://mathiasbynens.be/notes/javascript-encoding
Received on Wednesday, 15 October 2014 05:08:07 UTC