- From: Doug Schepers <schepers@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2014 14:49:37 -0500
- To: Stian Soiland-Reyes <soiland-reyes@cs.manchester.ac.uk>, Annotation WG <public-annotation@w3.org>
Hi, Stian– On 11/14/14 7:08 AM, Stian Soiland-Reyes wrote: > Here are my suggestions for temporary short names (which admittedly > are not that short): > > We already have agreed: > web-annotation: Annotation Abstract Data Model I don't think we did agree on that. From the thread on this [1], I heard the most agreement on * annotation-model: Annotation Abstract Data Model The others Rob suggested work for me and Ivan (at least): * annotation-protocol * annotation-interface * web-anchoring Frederick suggested we start with "annotation-model" and worry about the others later. > so.. > web-annotation-vocab: Vocabulary for the Annotation Abstract Data Model > web-annotation-serialization: Serializations of the Annotation > Abstract Data Model > (or web-annotation-json if we only do JSON here) > web-annotation-api: HTTP API for Annotations > web-annotation-client: Client-Side API for Annotations > web-annotation-link: Robust Link Anchoring > > Do we really need "web-" btw? w3c is all about the web.. Rob made the same argument, and I think folks generally agreed. [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-annotation/2014Nov/0019.html Regards- -Doug
Received on Friday, 14 November 2014 19:49:45 UTC