Re: Agenda+ Social API Use Cases (was: [agenda} Web Annotation WG teleconf Agenda (2014-11-12))

+1 and many thanks for digging out the links from their wiki, Doug!

In particular:

On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 1:23 PM, Doug Schepers <schepers@w3.org> wrote:

> I'd like to have a brief discussion to follow up on the Social API use
> cases topic from the joint TPAC session with the Social WG.
> [1] https://www.w3.org/wiki/Socialig/Use_Case_TF


We should submit our use cases to them, starting with the digital
publishing use case document.
  http://w3c.github.io/dpub-annotation/     (comments still welcome, but it
will be published VERY soon)

And we should start our own use case set to extend those use cases where
necessary.

[2] https://www.w3.org/wiki/Socialwg/API_requirements


This is either worrying (if we're competing) or encouraging (if we're
working together) -- everything in the responses section is an annotation.


> [4] https://www.w3.org/wiki/Socialig/Use_Case_TF/Social_Data_Syntax


This looks like some baseline work on the ActivityStreams 2.0 ED that was
circulated?

Rob

-- 
Rob Sanderson
Technology Collaboration Facilitator
Digital Library Systems and Services
Stanford, CA 94305