Ontotext, HL7 & StratML

Vladmir, presumably, if "topics" were expressed as plans in open, 
standard, machine-readable format, the conglomeration of them would be 
less bewildering and service providers like Ontotext could make them 
readily comprehensible to stakeholders.

Toward that end, Ontotext's about statement is now in the StratML 
collection, at http://stratml.us/drybridge/index.htm#ONTXT

I'd love to see what you and your colleagues can do with the collection, 
which now comprises more that 4,000 documents.  See tool, app & service 
requirement Goal 4: Query/Discovery 
<http://stratml.us/carmel/iso/SMLTASwStyle.xml#_15446932-208f-11e6-a80e-7333871eb3cb> 
- Enable not only full-text but also faceted querying and discovery of 
discrete elements of StratML documents.

Ron Reck has expressed interest in helping to RDF'ify the StratML core 
vocabulary: Vision, Mission, Value(s), Goal(s), Objective(s), and 
Stakeholder(s).

Among the purposes of the StratML standard 
<http://stratml.us/#DefinitionPurposes> is to facilitate the discovery 
and engagement of performance partners.

BTW, it would also be good to update and expand upon HL7's plan in 
StratML format: http://stratml.us/drybridge/index.htm#HL7

Owen

On 1/16/2020 6:31 AM, Vladimir Alexiev wrote:
> Hi everyone!
> I'm lurking on this list and I find the set of topics large and 
> bewildering.
>
> > HL7 v3 can not be fully implemented with the current state of Object 
> Databases.
>
> I'm interested in HL7 and in particular FHIR.
> FHIR has an RDF/JSONLD representation, and the schema is represented 
> as SHEX (amongst several other implementations, including JSON/JSON 
> schema, XML/RelaxNG etc).
> I think this is a very interesting piece of work and I'm interested in 
> collaborations.
>
> Cheers!