Re: KG as KR as rubbish?

Paola, I defer to you and others with more expertise than I to address 
the scientific intricacies of this issue.

However, from my perspective, the document itself is indicative of an 
important problem, which is forcing people to scroll through a bunch of 
text (and figures) to find anything upon which they might be able to act.

It would be nice to think knowledgeable scholars might learn to do 
better than that.

I could probably craft StratML files for some, if not all, of the 16 
section of the document but your message does not instill confidence 
that it might be worthwhile to take the time or trouble to do so.

BTW, I too am reticent to criticize the perspectives of others. Indeed, 
I welcome the opportunity to learn from them ... provided they don't 
insist upon making it excessively difficult to do.

Owen

On 8/28/2019 1:38 AM, Paola Di Maio wrote:
> I do not normally like to call stuff I disagree with  rubbish. I 
> rarely do that.
>
> but To propose KG as the future of KR sounds like complete rubbish to me
> (shall try to justify this statement more scientifically)
>
> I am shocked to see the cream of our research community being part of this
> disinformation campaign
> /aic.ai.wu.ac.at/~polleres/publications/bona-etal-DagstuhlReport18371.pdf 
> <http://aic.ai.wu.ac.at/~polleres/publications/bona-etal-DagstuhlReport18371.pdf>