Re: AI KR Talk in Taipei, contributions?

Thank you Owen

You send so much stuff and seems all good
I completely dislike politics, makes me dizzy even

I can easily add two links to the slides and video to my slides and paper
as pointers to this work

Please take a few more days to elaborate with your associates0 we have one
week or so -

 please give url for both the resources you attached and  if you could
edit to explain (assuming the audience may not know) with a simple sentence
for each point

- what is machine readability
- how is stratml good to deliver machine readabiity and other benefits vs
other options
(with link to stratml.org)
- how is machine redabiity relates to KR and explainability

This will make the contribution more relevant to the talk
thank you

P

On Thu, Aug 22, 2019 at 10:47 AM Owen Ambur <Owen.Ambur@verizon.net> wrote:

> Paola, there's nifty introduction to StratML presentation at
> https://www.yumpu.com/en/document/view/32364433/introduction-to-stratml-aiim/2
> However, it is a bit outdated, is not particularly tailored for a KR
> audience, and probably includes TMI as well.  So I whipped up the attached
> four slides.  Please let me know if you'd like anything more or different.
>
> This site reads a previous version of Wikipedia's article on StratML for
> the benefit of the blind, including information subsequently deleted by the
> Wikipedia police:
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wV_6rsBOG4o&feature=youtu.be
>
> I'm not much for making (or watching) videos myself but I know that many
> others are.  So I'm copying a couple of my associates in the event they may
> wish to take up that cause.
>
> It's not just politicians who don't want to be held accountable.  That's
> human nature.  So beyond the obligation of each of us to hold ourselves and
> our immediate associates accountable, we also have the power to hold public
> officials accountable -- regardless of whether they are willing "man up" to
> doing so themselves or not.  However, accountability means more than merely
> holding opinions and criticizing, based upon our own biases and dueling
> narratives.  It requires clearly specified performance metrics, readily
> available to stakeholders.
>
> In short it requires an open, standard, machine-readable format like
> StratML.
>
> President Trump's management agenda is available in StratML format at
> http://stratml.us/drybridge/index.htm#Trump, along with a link that opens
> it in an XForm for anyone who may wish to reports his administration's
> performance against those objectives.
>
> Former President Obama's change.gov agenda is available at
> http://stratml.us/drybridge/index.htm#Obama
>
> A bunch of candidate issue statements are available in StratML format at
> http://ambur.net/#Candidates
>
> The question is whether voters truly want change or whether, like
> politicians themselves, they are satisfied with more of the same,
> self-serving #GOFPAU
> <https://www.linkedin.com/search/results/all/?authorCompany=%5B%5D&authorIndustry=%5B%5D&contactInterest=%5B%5D&facetCity=%5B%5D&facetCompany=%5B%5D&facetConnectionOf=%5B%5D&facetCurrentCompany=%5B%5D&facetCurrentFunction=%5B%5D&facetGeoRegion=%5B%5D&facetGroup=%5B%5D&facetGuides=%5B%5D&facetIndustry=%5B%5D&facetNetwork=%5B%5D&facetNonprofitInterest=%5B%5D&facetPastCompany=%5B%5D&facetProfessionalEvent=%5B%5D&facetProfileLanguage=%5B%5D&facetRegion=%5B%5D&facetSchool=%5B%5D&facetSeniority=%5B%5D&facetServiceCategory=%5B%5D&facetState=%5B%5D&groups=%5B%5D&keywords=%23gofpau&origin=GLOBAL_SEARCH_HEADER&page=1&refresh=false&skillExplicit=%5B%5D&topic=%5B%5D>
> and only care about gaining the upper hand to impose their will upon
> others... in which case we will be demonstrating a sadly lacking sense of
> enlightenment ... an inability to learn from the mistakes of the past, thus
> dooming future generations to re-living it.
> https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/enlightenment-what-we-fighting-owen-ambur/
> |
> https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/fighting-political-polarization-owen-ambur/
>
> If that's the case, shame on us.
>
> Owen
> On 8/21/2019 12:35 PM, Paola Di Maio wrote:
>
> Thank you Owen
> Most politicians do not really want to be held accountable for what they
> say or do, especially when
> their missions fail for unknown reasons (manouvers in political underworld
> to ensure discord) really
> that is the problem that xml wont fix.
>
> People who understand machine readability, do not need to be convinced
> of anything, those who dont understanding may need a quick lecture,
>
> I ll make sure your contribution is included with your compliments :-) if
> you want to create
> a short video or set of slides introducing stratML in a few bullet points
> also its relation to KR
> I can also include it as a link as a footnote in the slides and paper
> Delivers value and does not cost anything
>
> Thanks
> PDM
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, Aug 22, 2019 at 12:17 AM Owen Ambur <Owen.Ambur@verizon.net>
> wrote:
>
>> Paola, I'm not sure how it might fit into your outline, but from my
>> perspective, any discussion of "explainability in e-governance" would be
>> incomplete without addressing the importance of machine-readable public
>> records based upon internationally standardized schemas.
>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Machine-readable_document |
>>
>> https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/open-gov-data-act-machine-readable-records-owen-ambur/
>>
>> E-gov plans and performance reports are particularly important sets of
>> such documents.
>>
>> https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/open-machine-readable-government-owen-ambur/
>>
>> BTW, it would also be good if the agendas for events like this were
>> published as performance plans in an open, standard, machine-readable
>> format like StratML Part 2 (formerly ANSI/AIIM 22:2017) so that
>> value-added intermediaries could facilitate stakeholder collaboration
>> before, during, and after each event. See, for example,
>> http://stratml.us/carmel/iso/part2/BS2019wStyle.xml
>>
>> In any event, IACT and TEG's about statements are now in the StratML
>> collection at http://stratml.us/drybridge/index.htm#IACT &
>> http://stratml.us/drybridge/index.htm#TEG
>>
>> Owen
>>
>> On 8/21/2019 1:14 AM, Paola Di Maio wrote:
>> > We are giving a talk *and a paper next month on the topic
>> >
>> > AI KR for Explainability in EGovernance
>> > https://iac2019.ndc.gov.tw/Content_List.aspx?n=81CD552EA1F70BF6
>> >
>> > The outline of the talk so far is: (2-4 slides for each point)
>> > overview and intro about AI KR and explainability (assuming audience
>> > doesn know)
>> > relevance to E-Governance
>> > challenges and solutions
>> > actions (probably referring people back to this group)
>> >
>> > If anyone is interested in contributing a few slides and a paragraph
>> > or two
>> > let me know and I ll share the drafts for editing, so that you can
>> > fill out a few bits
>> > and of course be credited accordingly
>> >
>> > deadline for final submission is 1 Sept , so all contributions must
>> > reach me before Aug 30
>> > so that I can edit them into the draft
>> >
>> > Thanks, best regards
>>
>>