[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Posting of contributions in the PSO website



I am definitely not in favour of this proposal.

The PSO web pages should contain information specifically related to the 
activities of the PSO itself. To place documents on the PSO pages which are 
not agreed PSO positions may allow the documents to be misinterpreted as 
representing positions held by all PSO members.

If ETSI has made contributions to ICANN then the logical places to look for 
these contributions is within ETSI or within ICANN. It does not strike me 
as logical that these documents should be listed by the PSO as well, 
particularly when they are simply not PSO documents.

regards,

    Geoff





At 4/15/2002 09:15 PM, azucena.hernandezperez@telefonica.es wrote:
>Dear PSO PC colleagues,
>
>ETSI has made so far 4 contributions sent to Mr Lynn in reply of a message
>from him requesting opinion from the PSO. These 4 contributions were not
>agreed by consensus within the PSO PC and therefore were sent to ICANN only
>on behalf of ETSI.
>
>The 4 documents are referenced in the minutes of our teleconferences as
>ETSI informed about the documents and there were discussions about their
>content. Due to this fact, we, in ETSI, are getting requests from readers
>who are interested on the documents and can not find them in the PSO
>website (because they are not there).
>
>The documents are available in the ETSI website, of course, but, in my
>opinion, there should also be visible in the PSO website as they have been
>prepared to give answers to public requests made by ICANN Board or CEO to
>the PSO.
>
>I propose to create a specific area in the PSO website to allocate
>"Positions from PSO members on ICANN matters". That page would then simply
>hiperlink to the specific part within each member website where the actual
>document should be available. This proposal would increase the visibility
>of the documents agreed within each PSO member organization and complete
>the information included in the minutes.
>
>Any problem with the proposal?.
>Kind regards,
>Azucena
>*********************************************************
>Azucena Hernandez
>Telefonica de España
>  Desarrollo de Red
>Tel: +34 91 5846842
>Fax: +34 91 5846843
>GSM: +34 609425506
>E-Mail: azucena.hernandezperez@telefonica.es
>***********************************************************
>
>___________________________________________________________________________
>
>Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario y puede contener
>información privilegiada o confidencial. Si no es vd. el destinatario
>indicado, queda notificado de que la utilización, divulgación y/o copia sin
>autorización está prohibida en virtud de la legislación vigente. Si ha
>recibido este mensaje por error, le rogamos que nos lo comunique
>inmediatamente por esta misma vía y proceda a su destrucción.
>
>
>This message is intended exclusively for its addressee and may contain
>information that is CONFIDENTIAL and protected by professional privilege.
>If you are not the intended recipient you are hereby notified that any
>dissemination, copy or disclosure of this communication is strictly
>prohibited by law. If this message has been received in error, please
>immediately notify us via e-mail and delete it.
>___________________________________________________________________________