[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: Election of the new Member to the ICANN Board



I don't see why we would have to elect members whose terms of office do not
expire.

Best,
Richard


-----------------------------------------
Richard Hill
Counsellor, SG2
International Telecommunication Union
Place des Nations
CH-1211 Geneva 20
Switzerland
tel: +41 22 730 5887
FAX: +41 22 730 5853
Email: richard.hill@itu.int
Study Group 2 email: tsbsg2@itu.int
 



> -----Original Message-----
> From: azucena.hernandezperez@telefonica.es
> [mailto:azucena.hernandezperez@telefonica.es]
> Sent: Thursday, 04 April 2002 9:27
> To: Brian Moore
> Cc: pso-pc@ties.itu.int
> Subject: Re: Election of the new Member to the ICANN Board
> 
> 
> Dear Brian, dear all,
> 
> I agree with your view on assuming that there is no hurry to 
> fill up Phil's
> vacancy and the normal procedure to have the new Board member 
> elected by
> October will be followed unless advised otherwise . It would 
> also be useful
> to include your question on whether the whole ICANN Board needs to be
> elected next October or only those whose period of 3 years 
> have expired. I
> now doubt on whether or not we have to elect only 1 member 
> because Phil's
> term of office was going to expire in October anyhow, or 
> whether we have to
> elect the 3 Board members from the PSO.
> 
> Kind regards,
> Azucena
> 
> 
> 
> 
> "Brian Moore" <brian@BWMC.DEMON.CO.UK>@pso.icann.org con 
> fecha 03/04/2002
> 19:17:28
> 
> Por favor, responda a "Brian Moore" <brian@BWMC.DEMON.CO.UK>
> 
> Enviado por:   owner-pso-pc@pso.icann.org
> 
> 
> Destinatarios: "Androuchko, Vladimir" <vladimir.androuchko@itu.int>,
>       "pso-pc, ITU \(MLIST\)" <pso-pc@ties.itu.int>
> CC:
> Asunto:   Re: Election of the new Member to the ICANN Board
> 
> 
> Vlad,
> Is the whole board re/elected in October or just those standing down?
> My feeling is that even if we speed up the process we will not do much
> better than appointing someone by end July. And is having 
> someone on the
> board two months earlier that critical.
> So maybe it would be better to word the letter with the 
> assumption that we
> will stick with the current timescale unless Lynne advises us 
> that he would
> rather we appoint a replacement as soon as possible.
> What do others think?
> Brian.
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Androuchko, Vladimir" <vladimir.androuchko@itu.int>
> To: "pso-pc, ITU (MLIST)" <pso-pc@ties.itu.int>
> Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2002 4:00 PM
> Subject: Election of the new Member to the ICANN Board
> 
> 
> > Dear Protocol Council Members,
> >
> > As Mr. Phil Davidson took his retirement, I would like to 
> kindly ask your
> > guidelines whether to ask Mr. S. Lynn if the PSO should fill up the
> vacancy
> > right now or Protocol Council can wait until October in 
> line with the
> > election of the whole ICANN Board.
> > If you wish so, please find below the draft letter to Mr. 
> S. Lynn for
> your
> > comments.
> > Best regards,
> > Vlad
> >
> > ***************************
> > Dear Stuart,
> >
> > As you know, one of the Directors of the ICANN Board 
> elected by PSO, Mr.
> > Phil Davidson resigned.
> > On behalf of the PSO Protocol Council I would like to 
> kindly ask you to
> > clarify whether the PSO
> > should fill up the vacancy right now or can wait until 
> October in line
> with
> > the election of the whole ICANN Board.
> >
> > Faithfully yours,
> > Vladimir
> >
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ______________________________________________________________
> _____________
> 
> Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario y 
> puede contener
> información privilegiada o confidencial. Si no es vd. el destinatario
> indicado, queda notificado de que la utilización, divulgación 
> y/o copia sin
> autorización está prohibida en virtud de la legislación vigente. Si ha
> recibido este mensaje por error, le rogamos que nos lo comunique
> inmediatamente por esta misma vía y proceda a su destrucción.
> 
> 
> This message is intended exclusively for its addressee and may contain
> information that is CONFIDENTIAL and protected by 
> professional privilege.
> If you are not the intended recipient you are hereby notified that any
> dissemination, copy or disclosure of this communication is strictly
> prohibited by law. If this message has been received in error, please
> immediately notify us via e-mail and delete it.
> ______________________________________________________________
> _____________
>