For your information. Best regards, Azucena >Return-Path: <froomkin@law.miami.edu> >Sender: froomkin@law.miami.edu >Date: Thu, 09 Aug 2001 09:58:24 +1000 >From: Michael Froomkin <froomkin@law.miami.edu> >X-Accept-Language: en,pdf >To: Jonathan Weinberg <weinberg@mail.msen.com> >CC: hans@icann.org, Amadeu@nominalia.com, ken.fockler@sympatico.ca, > mkatoh@mkatoh.net, apisan@servidor.unam.mx, touton@icann.org, > lynn@icann.org, azucena.hernandez@pop3.telefonica.es, > leslie@thinkingcat.com >Subject: Re: my reconsideration request >References: <5.0.2.1.2.20010809104710.01c60780@mail.msen.com> > >I'm in Australia and have very limited email, which is why Jon couldn't >reach me to check on this before sending it. But I fully agree with >it. > >Jonathan Weinberg wrote: >> >> Hans, Amadeu, Ken, Katoh-san, Alejandro, and Louis: >> >> This is meant as a personal message, not as part of the official >> reconsideration file; I'm speaking for myself alone. Michael Froomkin and >> I filed a reconsideration request yesterday, asking that ICP-3 (Stuart >> Lynn's paper on "A Unique, Authoritative Root for the DNS") be withdrawn >> from the ICP series, because it announces new policies that weren't >> developed through bottom-up process. A colleague let me know this morning >> that the PSO is currently developing a communication paper on alternate >> roots. Leslie Daigle has forwarded RFC 2826 to W3C, ETSI, and ITU; it will >> be considered within ITU by ITU Study Group 2, and within ETSI by its >> Technical Bodies SPAN and TIPHON. I gather that the PSO Council plans to >> prepare a common position on "Protocol aspects related to the Alternative >> Root issue", to be sent to the Board for consideration in Montevideo. >> >> This, it seems to me, is exactly how the process should work. Once the >> Board receives the PSO's paper, it can refer it to the DNSO for its input; >> then, after fair public comment, it will be in a position to adopt the >> document (with any appropriate changes) as its own. The resulting >> document, I expect, will resemble Stuart's paper in some respects and >> differ in others. Everybody wins if ICP-3 is withdrawn from the ICP series >> so that it can be replaced by a document that is the product of a bona fide >> consensus process. >> >> Jon >> >> Jonathan Weinberg >> weinberg@msen.com > >-- >A. Michael Froomkin | Professor of Law | froomkin@law.tm >U. Miami School of Law, P.O. Box 248087, Coral Gables, FL 33124 USA >+1 (305) 284-4285 | +1 (305) 284-6506 (fax) | http://www.law.tm > --> It's hot there. I'm elsewhere. <-- > ************************************************* Azucena Hernandez Telefonica Desarrollo de Red c/ Emilio Vargas, 4. E-28043-MADRID Tel: +34 91 5846842 Fax: +34 91 5846843 GSM: +34 609 425506 E-Mail: azucena.hernandez@telefonica.es ************************************************ =========================================================================