W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > png-group@w3.org > June 2003

Re: [png-list] Re: [Fwd: http://www.w3.org/TR/]

From: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2003 15:16:16 +0200
Message-ID: <187333841208.20030603151616@w3.org>
To: owner-png-list@ccrc.wustl.edu, Glenn Randers-Pehrson <glennrp@comcast.net>
CC: png-group@w3.org, png-list@ccrc.wustl.edu, Susan Foord <susan.foord@ntlworld.com>

On Tuesday, June 3, 2003, 2:54:06 PM, Glenn wrote:


GRP> Susan Foord and I have had some offline discussion of her suggestion,
GRP> and as a result the recommendation is now, in the interest of clarity,
GRP> to change parts of PNG second edition, Clause 4.4, PNG Image, indicated
GRP> by the square brackets:

GRP>    c. Truecolor: ... The alpha channel may be represented by
GRP>       a single [pixel] value.  Matching pixels ...
GRP>    d. Greyscale: ... The alpha channel may be represented by
GRP>       a single [pixel value as in] the previous case. ...

GRP>    ... size of each sample, not the total [pixel size].

GRP>  to read:

GRP>    c. Truecolor: ... The alpha channel may be represented by
GRP>       a single RGB value.  Matching pixels ...
GRP>    d. Greyscale: ... The alpha channel may be represented by
GRP>       a single greyscale value, similar to the previous case. ...

GRP>    ... size of each sample, not the total number of bits per pixel.

Yes, I think that is clearer and more precise.

-- 
 Chris                            mailto:chris@w3.org
Received on Tuesday, 3 June 2003 09:16:48 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 17 May 2012 12:13:25 GMT