IP Ports vs. Negotiation

• To: ssl-talk@netscape.com, ietf-tls@w3.org
• Subject: IP Ports vs. Negotiation
• From: Paul Foster <pfoster@ml.com>
• Date: Mon, 10 Feb 1997 15:56:27 -0500
• From ietf-tls-request@www10.w3.org Mon Feb 10 15: 55:51 1997
• Message-ID: <32FF8B7B.44F2@ml.com>
• Organization: Independent Consultant
• References: <Pine.LNX.3.95q.970210222147.13851E-100000@bilbo.thawte.com>
• Reply-To: pfoster@ml.com
• X-List-URL: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/ietf-tls
• X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.0Gold (WinNT; U)

On the subject of port numbers vs. negotiation I have the following
questions:

Doesn't SSL/TLS over HTTP (aka HTTPS) set a precedent by using port 443
instead of 80? Shouldn't this issue be resolved by now? 

Paul Foster

• Re: IP Ports vs. Negotiation
• From: Mark Shuttleworth <marks@thawte.com>

• Simple TLS/SSL negotiation proposal
• From: Mark Shuttleworth <marks@thawte.com>

• Prev: Re: IP Ports vs. Negotiation
• Next: Re: NULL_ ciphersuite meets ftps
• Index: Message index of ietf-tls@w3.org mailing list
• Thread: Thread index of ietf-tls@w3.org mailing list