- From: Marc Horowitz <marc@cygnus.com>
- Date: 10 Feb 1997 15:06:10 -0500
- To: David.Brownell@Eng.Sun.COM (David Brownell - JavaSoft)
- Cc: ietf-tls@w3.org, pfh@uk.ibm.com
David.Brownell@Eng.Sun.COM (David Brownell - JavaSoft) writes: >> > I don't see how this can be accused of holding anything up, as the >> > draft (cat-ftpsec) is already written and awaiting eager developers. >> >> Similarly, draft-murray-auth-ftp-ssl-00.txt is already written etc. >> >> Speaking as a potential implementor, the approach in the ftp-ssl draft >> gets my vote on time to market and on how readily it can be implemented >> correctly and interoperably. ftpsec-09 current has four organizations (that I know of, there are probably mode) implementing using kerberos or gssapi. Three of these implementations are independent. With a few exceptions which recent version of the draft address, they interoperate. I will admit that I have not read the murray draft, but it seems poor to ignore an existing, implemented propsal. Marc
Received on Monday, 10 February 1997 15:05:28 UTC