- From: Tom Weinstein <tomw@netscape.com>
- Date: Thu, 06 Feb 1997 10:26:23 -0800
- To: Eric Young <eay@mincom.com>
- CC: Christian Kuhtz <chk@gnu.ai.mit.edu>, Mark Shuttleworth <marks@thawte.com>, Christopher Allen <ChristopherA@consensus.com>, Tim Hudson <tjh@mincom.com>, ietf-tls@w3.org, ssl-talk@netscape.com
Eric Young wrote: > > Ok, I had retrieved 'draft-ietf-tls-ssl-mods-00.txt' from > rs.internic.net for a quick review since I did not want to scan all 66 > pages of the tls spec and try to spot the differences. It is > obviously a little dated.. Ah, that's the problem. That doesn't specify the differences between draft-ietf-tls-protocol-00.txt and the SSL spec. It recommends further changes in addition to those made for the current TLS. Those changes were gone over at the San Jose meeting, and I think we accepted all of them, but they haven't been integrated into the spec yet. When they are, I'm sure the version number will be rev'ed. The only difference between the current TLS spec and the SSL spec is some clarifications and formatting changes in the document. The protocols are identical. -- You should only break rules of style if you can | Tom Weinstein coherently explain what you gain by so doing. | tomw@netscape.com
Received on Thursday, 6 February 1997 13:56:09 UTC