Re: TLS working group minutes, Montreal IETF

To: Win Treese <treese@openmarket.com>
Subject: Re: TLS working group minutes, Montreal IETF
From: Dennis Glatting <dennisg@plaintalk.bellevue.wa.us>
Date: Sat, 13 Jul 96 00:09:29 -0700
cc: ietf-tls@w3.org
From ietf-tls-request@www10.w3.org Sat Jul 13 03: 09:41 1996
References: <2.2.32.19960711064837.0089f1f8@mail-60.OpenMarket.com>
Reply-To: dennis.glatting@plaintalk.bellevue.wa.us


Date: Thu, 11 Jul 1996 02:48:37 -0400
From: Win Treese <treese@openmarket.com>

> Transport Layer Security Working Group
> Meeting at the 36th IETF
> 24 June 1996
>
> Reported by Win Treese (treese@OpenMarket.com)
>
> 	...
>
> 5. There was some discussion of including compression in
> the protocol. The current SSL draft has a placeholder,
> but no compression algorithms are defined. Jeff
> Schiller pointed out that compression has run into
> patent problems, especially when connected with
> encryption.
>

Is there a problem with having GNU ZIP as a compression
algorithm?


-dpg

References:

TLS working group minutes, Montreal IETF

From: Win Treese <treese@OpenMarket.com>

Prev: TLS negotiation mechanism
Next: TLS working group minutes, Montreal IETF
Index: Message index of ietf-tls@w3.org mailing list
Thread: Thread index of ietf-tls@w3.org mailing list