At 7:10 PM +0100 3/10/97, LUIS SAIZ GIMENO wrote: >Does [HMAC] (p. 14) corresponds to [KRAW] (p. 63)? There is not [HMAC] >in the bibliography. > >Does this reference corresponds to the RFC 2104 "HMAC: Keyed-Hashing for >Message Authentication", also by Hugo Krawczyk? If so, I think it's a >better reference. > > Luis Saiz Yes; the omission of [HMAC] was an error in the preparation which has been rectified. [KRAW] will be removed. Also, a reference to the PKIX draft will be inserted, specifing it as the guiding authorithy on X.509 certificate profiles. - Tim Tim Dierks - timd@consensus.com - www.consensus.com Software Haruspex - Consensus Development Developer of SSL Plus: SSL 3.0 Integration SuiteReceived on Monday, 10 March 1997 14:46:56 EST
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 24 September 2003 06:34:59 EDT