W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-tls@w3.org > January to March 1997

IP Ports vs. Negotiation

From: Paul Foster <pfoster@ml.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Feb 1997 15:56:27 -0500
Message-ID: <32FF8B7B.44F2@ml.com>
To: ssl-talk@netscape.com, ietf-tls@w3.org

On the subject of port numbers vs. negotiation I have the following
questions:

Doesn't SSL/TLS over HTTP (aka HTTPS) set a precedent by using port 443
instead of 80? Shouldn't this issue be resolved by now? 

Paul Foster

Received on Monday, 10 February 1997 15:55:51 EST

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Mark Shuttleworth: "Re: IP Ports vs. Negotiation"
Previous message: David Brownell - JavaSoft: "Re: NULL_ ciphersuite meets ftps"
In reply to: Mark Shuttleworth: "Simple TLS/SSL negotiation proposal"
Next in thread: Mark Shuttleworth: "Re: IP Ports vs. Negotiation"
Reply: Mark Shuttleworth: "Re: IP Ports vs. Negotiation"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search in the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 24 September 2003 06:34:59 EDT