Win, Win Treese wrote: > > I think that we have a practical problem to solve in > the short term. Even if we agreed that the "right thing" > was to multiplex applications over a TLS channel, or > that the "right thing" was to let applications negotiate > their own use of TLS, it would take a while to get the > necessary specs on the standards track. > > Chris's proposal lets a number of projects proceed, > so I think we should go ahead with it. I encourage > continued thinking and proposals to solve the broader > problem, but I think they go beyond the charter of > this working group now. I am not sure that I agree in total. But as I am probaly in a minority possition here. I suppose the point is Moot. It jsut seems to me that additional ports are just not necessary and a bad idea long term. I understand the time element for some projects. I just feel that it is a bad trade off. Sets a bad precident. > > Win Treese Regards, -- Jeffrey A. Williams DIR. Internet Network Eng/SR. Java Development Eng. Information Eng. Group. Phone :913-294-2375 (temporary) E-Mail jwkckid1@ix.netcom.comReceived on Sunday, 9 February 1997 16:35:16 EST
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 24 September 2003 06:34:59 EDT