Re: HELP with Method Name in SWAP headers

Larry, I'll post the minutes of SWAP tomorrow.


Art

In message <000d01be27cb$a07f6360$aa66010d@copper.parc.xerox.com>, Larry Masinte
r writes:
>> 	Am I to understand that the idea of placing these methods into the
>> header is NOT settled - and that I can implement this NOW any way I want?
>
>Until there is a standard, there is no standard.
>
>You can always implement things NOW however you want. The only question
>is whether you will find the resulting interoperability satisfactory.
>
>Has anyone reported the minutes from the SWAP meeting at the last IETF?
>I couldn't make it (a conflict with another WG which I couldn't miss),
>but the report I heard didn't make it sound like good news.
>
>> 	I'd hate to write it one way now just to change it later - but I
>> need to get something going now!
>
>The price of early adoption is the likelihood of having to change things.
>
>
>Larry
>

Received on Monday, 14 December 1998 23:23:51 UTC