- From: Roberto Polli <robipolli@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 2 May 2024 16:23:54 +0200
- To: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>
- Cc: Lucas Pardue <lucas@lucaspardue.com>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Hi Murray, On Thu, 2 May 2024 at 16:10, Murray S. Kucherawy <superuser@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Fri, Apr 19, 2024 at 9:26 AM Lucas Pardue <lucas@lucaspardue.com> wrote: >> >> Hey, >> >> On Fri, Apr 19, 2024, at 17:15, Roberto Polli wrote: >> >> Dear Murray, >> >> >> On Thu, 18 Apr 2024 at 15:45, Murray S. Kucherawy <superuser@gmail.com> wrote: >> > >> > On Thu, Apr 4, 2024 at 7:05 AM Murray S. Kucherawy <superuser@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >> >> Congrats for getting this across the finish line! >> >> Thanks! It was a long journey! >> >> >> This RFC creates a new IANA registry that requires the appointment of designated experts. Do we have any appointees or volunteers? >> > No reply on this thread. Any nominees or volunteers? Are the authors available to provide this support? This is what the shepherd writeup suggested. >> >> I am available to volunteer, though it would be great to have someone >> with more experience in the field to support me. >> I have never maintained a IANA registry. >> >> It's typically pretty light touch. The guidance we put into the RFC should be enough for an expert to figure it out. Especially here it's a sanity check that the algorithm key fits the rules and there is a suitable reference. >> >> I'm happy to provide informal support if/when the first couple of registration requests come in. I just want to avoid another formal monkey on my back. > > > We could list Roberto as primary with Lucas as secondary, if that works for both of you. OK to me. Thanks for all your support, Roberto.
Received on Thursday, 2 May 2024 14:24:10 UTC